Microscopes are often grouped by more than one attribute, and that can be confusing when you are deciding what to buy or use. A microscope’s “type” is usually defined by its optical geometry (how the objective(s), tube lenses, and eyepieces or camera are arranged), its illumination path (transmitted through the specimen or reflected off a surface), and its intended magnification and working distance range. Understanding these axes of classification makes the landscape of models and features much easier to navigate.
\n
\n \nDark Cool Optical Microscope 3d model using Blender with back light Artist: Rouibi Dhia Eddine Nadjm\n
\n
\n
At the broadest level, consider three questions:
\n
\n
From which side does the light travel? In transmitted-light systems, light passes through the sample (typical for thin, semi-transparent specimens). In reflected-light systems, light illuminates opaque surfaces from above and returns to the objective.
\n
How many optical paths are there?Compound microscopes form a single, high-resolution image through one objective at a time, then split it to two eyepieces. Stereo microscopes form two slightly different images to each eye to create depth perception at low magnification.
\n
Where are the objectives located relative to the specimen?Upright systems view from above; inverted systems view from below, which changes sample handling and working distance.
\n
\n
Within each type, there are further distinctions. For example, stereo microscopes can be Greenough (two separate optical trains) or common main objective (CMO) designs (two parallel paths sharing a single large front objective). Likewise, compound microscopes can support multiple contrast modes—brightfield, phase contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), and fluorescence—though those are modalities layered onto the same upright geometry rather than separate types by themselves.
\n
Two more concepts tie microscope type to what you can realistically see:
\n
\n
Numerical Aperture (NA) quantifies how much light an objective gathers and, directly, its resolving power. Higher NA allows finer detail to be distinguished at the same wavelength, but usually shortens working distance and reduces depth of field.
\n
Working Distance (WD) is the physical gap from the objective’s front lens to the in-focus specimen surface. Stereo and inspection microscopes are designed for long WDs to accommodate tools and larger objects; high-NA compound objectives have short WDs so they can collect steep light cones.
\n
\n
Because resolution depends on NA and wavelength, not just magnification, the same total magnification can produce dramatically different image quality across types. A low-NA stereo microscope at 80× will not reveal cellular detail that a high-NA compound microscope can show at a similar or even lower magnification. We unpack these relationships in Magnification, Resolution, NA, and Illumination Across Types, and we suggest practical choices in How to Choose the Right Microscope Type.
Stereo microscopes (also called dissecting microscopes) deliver a three-dimensional visual impression by sending two slightly different images—one to each eye. This stereopsis comes from either two independent objective lenses (Greenough design) or two parallel optical paths behind a large shared objective (CMO design). The geometric separation between the two optical paths creates parallax, which the brain interprets as depth.
\n
Unlike high-power compound microscopes that are optimized for thin, transmitted-light specimens and fine resolution, stereo microscopes emphasize:
\n
\n
Low to moderate total magnification—commonly covering ranges such as 5× to 80× with zoom or stepped magnification changers. Precise ranges vary with objective and eyepiece combinations.
\n
Long working distance, enabling manipulation of objects under the lenses with tweezers, soldering irons, probes, or micro-tools.
\n
Wide field of view and large depth of field at lower NA, making it easier to keep three-dimensional parts in focus across uneven surfaces.
\n
Flexibility of illumination for opaque specimens: ring lights, coaxial reflected light, oblique side lighting, or transmitted bases for thin, semi-transparent objects such as small aquatic organisms or plant tissue sections.
\n
\n
Two mainstream optical layouts are worth knowing:
\n
\n
Greenough stereo: Two angled objectives, each with its own optical train, converge on the specimen. This design is compact, economical, and robust. Because each optical path looks at the specimen from a slightly different angle, out-of-focus blur at the edges can be more apparent at high zoom settings—a trade-off many users find acceptable for routine inspection and dissection.
\n
CMO stereo (Common Main Objective): A single large front lens feeds two parallel beam paths through internal zoom optics to the eyepieces. CMO systems tend to offer superior optical performance at higher zoom, expansive accessory options (beam splitters for cameras, coaxial epi-illumination modules), and more uniform image quality across the field, at the cost of greater size and complexity.
\n
\n
Because stereo microscopes operate at low NA, they do not resolve fine cellular structures. They excel instead at macroscopic tasks such as:
\n
\n
Electronics assembly and inspection of printed circuit boards (PCBs), connectors, and solder joints
\n
Entomology specimen preparation and external morphology studies
\n
Watchmaking, jewelry evaluation, and gemstone orientation
\n
3D-printed parts inspection, mechanical assemblies, and failure analysis of small components
\n
Educational demonstrations of small organisms or plant structures too thick for a compound microscope
\n
\n
Many stereo stands support boom arms, articulating arms, or track stands to position the optics over large workpieces. Optional auxiliary objectives can alter the zoom range, trading magnification for working distance or vice versa. Cameras can be added either via a trinocular port on a CMO head or with eyepiece adapters; keep in mind that image capture at low NA is more forgiving of vibration and lighting inconsistencies, making stereo microscopes friendly for live demonstrations and classroom use.
\n
If your primary goal is a comfortable, manipulable, 3D view of millimeter-scale features, a stereo microscope is usually the right type. For thin, transparent specimens requiring higher resolution of micrometer-scale detail, consider a compound microscope instead.
\n\n
Compound (Upright) Microscopes for Transmitted Detail
\n
The compound microscope is the workhorse for viewing thin, translucent specimens at medium to high magnification with high resolution. In an upright compound microscope, the objective sits above the specimen and the condenser below it, with light transmitted upward through the sample. The single, high-NA objective forms an intermediate image that is then magnified by the eyepiece or projected to a camera.
\n
\n \nBinocular compound microscope from 1914; Carl Zeiss (1816–88), Jena, Germany; materials: brass, metal, glass; owner: The Golub Collection, University of California, Berkeley. Artist: Chad Anderson, staff photographer for SFO Museum\n
\n
\n
Several characteristics define compound microscopes:
\n
\n
Objective turret (nosepiece) with a set of objectives—commonly including low-power (e.g., 4×), medium (e.g., 10×), high dry (e.g., 40×), and oil-immersion (e.g., 100×). Exact magnifications vary by model, and performance depends on the objective’s NA rather than magnification alone.
\n
Condenser and diaphragm that shape the illumination and set the system’s effective NA from the illumination side. The condenser must be centered and focused to properly illuminate the specimen. The condenser aperture should be matched to the objective’s NA for optimal contrast and resolution.
\n
Short working distances at higher NA, especially for 40× and 100× objectives, which are designed to gather steep light cones. High-NA objectives are usually corrected for a standard cover glass thickness (often 0.17 mm) and immersion medium (air or oil) as specified by the manufacturer.
\n
Multiple contrast methods for transparent specimens, including brightfield (amplitude contrast), phase contrast (phase-to-intensity conversion for phase objects), and DIC (gradient contrast for fine relief-like shading), as well as fluorescence excitation for labeled structures. These methods build on the same upright geometry.
\n
\n
Because resolution scales with NA and wavelength, compound microscopes deliver the detail needed for many educational and hobbyist explorations of thin specimens, such as:
\n
\n
Plant tissue sections, algae, protists, and small aquatic organisms mounted on slides
\n
Thin sections of wood, fibers, and microstructures in materials that transmit light
\n
Prepared slides of diatoms, histology teaching samples, and general microscopy education
\n
\n
Two optical systems—finite-conjugate and infinity-corrected—are common in compound microscopes. In a finite system, the objective forms an image at a fixed mechanical tube length before the eyepiece; in an infinity system, the objective outputs a collimated beam that is focused by a tube lens. Infinity systems simplify the addition of intermediate components (e.g., filters, beam splitters) without introducing focus shifts, and they dominate modern designs.
\n
Key trade-offs arise from high-NA imaging:
\n
\n
\n
Depth of field decreases with increasing NA, so focusing becomes more sensitive and only a thin slice of a three-dimensional specimen appears sharp at once.
\n
Field of view narrows at higher magnifications, and precise slide preparation (uniform thickness, clean coverslips) helps maximize image quality.
\n
Illumination and condenser settings matter for contrast and resolution. For example, matching the condenser aperture to the objective’s NA helps maintain resolution and contrast balance. If you switch objectives, revisit the condenser aperture setting accordingly.
\n
\n
Compound microscopes can also support reflected-light (epi-illumination) modules for opaque microstructures—though that use case is more typical of metallurgical microscopes. If your specimens are thicker, live in dishes, or require more working distance, an inverted microscope may be more practical while still using high-NA objectives designed for transmitted or reflected illumination as needed.
\n\n
Inverted Microscopes: Imaging from Below
\n
\n \nBy Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) 2007. Zeiss ID 03 Inverted microscope for tissue culture. Artist: Zephyris at English Wikipedia\n
\n
\n
Inverted microscopes position the objectives below the specimen and the condenser or illuminator above. This geometry is the mirror opposite of an upright compound microscope and is particularly useful when the specimen resides in a vessel or when you need more clearance above the sample.
\n
The inverted layout provides several advantages:
\n
\n
Large working clearance above the sample for micromanipulation, pipetting, or mounting devices and environmental chambers, while the optics approach from below.
\n
Compatibility with dishes and thicker samples, where viewing from below avoids compressing the specimen under a coverslip. Long working distance condensers and objectives accommodate common vessel bottoms of specified thicknesses.
\n
High-resolution options with objectives designed for the inverted geometry (including phase contrast, DIC, and fluorescence-capable optics), delivering similar resolving power to upright compound microscopes when using comparable NA.
\n
\n
Use an inverted microscope when you are working with specimens in containers, thicker materials where gravity helps keep the specimen stably positioned, or when instruments must operate above the sample. When your primary specimens are standard glass slides and thin sections, the upright compound microscope is typically more straightforward and economical.
\n\n
Metallurgical and Other Reflected‑Light Microscopes
\n
Metallurgical microscopes are specialized for imaging opaque specimens using reflected (epi-) illumination. Instead of transmitting light through a thin sample, these microscopes direct light down through the objective onto a surface and collect the reflected light back through the same objective. A beam splitter in the objective head or dedicated epi-illuminator sends light toward the sample and then passes returning light to the imaging path.
\n
Distinctive capabilities include:
\n
\n
High NA objectives for surface detail on metals, ceramics, and polymers. Resolution follows the same rules described in Magnification, Resolution, NA, and Illumination Across Types; reflected-light objectives are engineered for surface imaging rather than transmission through a cover glass.
\n
Brightfield and darkfield reflected contrast to highlight surface features and edges. Darkfield epi-illumination suppresses specular reflection and enhances scattering from scratches and microstructures.
\n
Compatibility with polished sections and cross-sections that reveal microstructure, grain boundaries, and inclusions under controlled lighting.
\n
\n
Reflected-light microscopes may be upright or inverted, depending on sample size and handling. In industry and materials science education, these instruments are commonly used to inspect machined surfaces, heat-treat microstructures, coating thickness steps, and defects such as pits or cracks. Although some metallurgical systems can also accept transmitted-light modules for thin sections, their primary design goal is surface analysis of opaque materials. If your specimens include anisotropic crystals or stress patterns, a polarizing microscope can add diagnostic contrast unavailable in unpolarized reflected-light alone.
\n\n
Polarizing Microscopes for Anisotropic Materials
\n
Polarizing microscopes incorporate linear polarizers in the illumination and detection paths to analyze materials whose optical properties depend on orientation—so-called anisotropic materials. In a basic configuration, a polarizer below the specimen sets a defined polarization direction for transmitted light, and an analyzer above the specimen passes only the orthogonal polarization. Isotropic materials appear dark under fully crossed polarizers; birefringent materials modify the polarization state and appear bright, often with characteristic colors when using white light.
\n
Defining features include:
\n
\n
Rotating stage with precise gradations (commonly 360° with vernier scales) to evaluate how brightness varies with orientation.
\n
Polarizer and analyzer with known orientation; the analyzer typically inserts into the optical path above the objective.
\n
Compensators/retarders (optional) such as first-order red plates or quarter-wave plates to estimate birefringence by shifting relative phase between orthogonal polarization components.
\n
Bertrand lens (in advanced systems) for conoscopic observation of interference figures, allowing analysis of optic axes in crystals.
\n
\n
Polarizing microscopes are indispensable in geology education for thin sections of rocks and minerals, polymer science for stress-induced birefringence, and inspection of oriented fibers and films. They can be upright or inverted and often share components with compound microscopes while adding the polarization optics and rotating stages. When your samples are opaque but anisotropic, reflected-light polarizing configurations are used; for translucent thin sections, transmitted polarizing setups are standard.
\n
Because polarization contrast is based on changes to the electric field’s orientation, it reveals information that amplitude-only methods cannot. That said, it does not replace high-NA detail where resolution limits dominate. Many laboratories combine polarizing contrast with other techniques depending on the question at hand.
\n\n
Digital and Video Microscopes: Screen‑Based Inspection
\n
Digital microscopes and video inspection systems use a camera and display rather than eyepieces. Optically, they range from simple macro lenses on stands to advanced CMO-style zoom optics feeding high-resolution sensors. The defining feature is ergonomic, screen-based viewing and the ability to capture, measure, and annotate images in real time.
\n
Key attributes:
\n
\n
Ergonomics and collaboration: Users view a monitor instead of peering through eyepieces, reducing neck strain and enabling group observation and instruction.
\n
Software-driven measurement: On-screen reticles, overlays, and calibration routines support dimensional measurements, angle checks, and pass/fail inspection workflows. Accuracy depends on proper calibration and the optical system’s NA and magnification.
\n
Flexible illumination: As with stereo microscopes, digital systems for opaque samples leverage ring lights, coaxial lighting, and oblique illumination; transmitted bases can be added for thin specimens.
\n
\n
It is important to recognize that sensors do not create optical resolution beyond what the lens provides. A high pixel count camera attached to a low-NA optical system will produce larger images without revealing finer detail—this is “empty magnification.” See Magnification, Resolution, NA, and Illumination Across Types for how to match sensor sampling to optical resolution. For many educational and hobbyist applications—inspection, documentation, and demonstrations—digital microscopes provide a compelling, shareable experience with adequate resolution for millimeter and sub-millimeter features.
\n\n
How to Choose the Right Microscope Type
\n
Selecting a microscope type is easier if you start from the specimen and the task. Use the decision prompts below to narrow your options, and follow internal links to the detailed sections on each type:
Transparent thin sections: Choose a compound microscope for transmitted light and high resolution.
\n
\n
\n
How much working distance do you need?\n
\n
Need tools above the specimen or a large clearance? Consider stereo or inverted configurations.
\n
Thin slides and careful stage control? An upright compound microscope is appropriate.
\n
\n
\n \nA black and white photo of a dissecting microscope with an attached light source. Artist: Sarah Greenwood\n
\n
\n
\n
What level of detail is required?\n
\n
Millimeter or hundreds of micrometer-scale features: stereo or digital/video systems suffice.
\n
Micrometer-scale structures in thin specimens: compound with appropriate objectives and contrast.
\n
Surface microstructure of opaque materials: metallurgical objectives and reflected-light contrast.
\n
\n
\n
Do material properties vary with orientation?\n
\n
If yes, a polarizing microscope can reveal anisotropy and birefringence not visible with unpolarized light.
\n
\n
\n
How will images be shared or measured?\n
\n
Group viewing and documentation: A digital microscope or a camera on a trinocular port is ideal.
\n
Precision dimensional checks: Ensure your system supports calibration and stable, repeatable magnification settings. Low-vibration stands and consistent illumination improve measurement reliability.
\n
\n
\n
\n
From there, refine your choice by considering the following trade-offs that apply across types:
\n
\n
Resolution vs. depth of field: Higher NA increases resolution but reduces depth of field. If you must keep a 3D surface in focus, lower NA optics (stereo, macro) yield a more forgiving image at the cost of fine detail.
\n
Field of view vs. magnification: As magnification increases, the field of view narrows. Choose appropriate magnification for the feature size you need to inspect routinely.
\n
Illumination geometry: Surface scratches may require oblique or darkfield reflected light; transparent details may need phase or DIC in transmitted light. Your chosen type should support the contrast methods relevant to your specimens.
\n
Sample handling: Heavy or large samples are more manageable with boom stands, long working distance optics, or inverted geometries.
\n
\n
Finally, keep expectations aligned with physics. As discussed in Magnification, Resolution, NA, and Illumination Across Types, do not chase magnification numbers without checking objective NA and illumination quality. An 80× stereo view will not approach the resolving power of a 40× high-NA compound objective, yet the stereo view may be vastly more useful for actual manipulation and inspection.
\n\n
Magnification, Resolution, NA, and Illumination Across Types
\n
A microscope type sets the stage for what optics and illumination can do, but the image you get follows universal relationships. This section compiles key principles in plain language so you can compare types with confidence.
\n
Magnification versus resolution
\n
Magnification describes how large an image appears. Resolution is the minimum spacing between two points that can be distinguished as separate. Magnifying an unresolved blur only gives a larger blur. To meaningfully increase detail, you must increase numerical aperture (NA) and/or use shorter wavelengths of light.
\n
For incoherent widefield imaging, a commonly used approximation for lateral resolution (Rayleigh criterion) is:
\n
d ≈ 0.61 · λ / NA
\n
where d is the smallest resolvable distance, λ is wavelength, and NA is the objective’s numerical aperture. Increasing NA reduces d, improving resolution.
\n
Practical implications across types:
\n
\n
Stereo microscopes use low-NA objectives to maintain a long working distance and large depth of field. Even at 80×, details below tens of micrometers are not resolved well. That’s consistent with their intended use for millimeter-scale inspection.
\n
Compound and inverted microscopes can use high-NA objectives (e.g., high dry and oil immersion) to achieve micrometer and sub-micrometer resolution in thin specimens. Working distance is short, and precise slide preparation improves results.
\n
Metallurgical microscopes with high-NA reflected-light objectives resolve fine surface features on opaque materials, provided the surface finish and illumination are well controlled.
\n
\n
Depth of field and working distance
\n
Depth of field (DoF) is the axial range over which the image appears acceptably sharp. In microscopy, DoF decreases as NA increases; a rule of thumb is that DoF scales approximately with 1/NA² for a given wavelength and refractive index. Working distance also tends to decrease as NA and magnification rise, because the front lens must be physically closer to the specimen to capture a wider cone of light.
\n
Type-to-type consequences:
\n
\n
Stereo: Low NA yields generous DoF and WD—excellent for uneven surfaces and hands-on work.
\n
Compound/inverted: High NA yields shallow DoF and short WD—excellent for thin, flat specimens requiring fine detail; more challenging for rough surfaces.
\n
Metallurgical: High NA for surfaces means shallow DoF; surface flatness and careful focusing are important. Tilted or rough samples may benefit from oblique or darkfield reflected illumination to increase edge contrast.
\n
\n
Illumination geometry and contrast
\n
The path and angular distribution of illumination determine which features stand out:
\n
\n
Transmitted brightfield (typical for compound and inverted systems) reveals absorption and attenuation differences in thin samples.
\n
Phase contrast (transmitted) converts phase shifts from transparent structures into intensity differences using phase plates and annuli matched to specific objectives.
\n
Differential interference contrast (DIC) (transmitted or reflected) uses sheared, polarized beams and Nomarski prisms to make optical path gradients appear as relief-like shading.
\n
Reflected brightfield and darkfield (typical for metallurgical) highlight surface microtopography and edges. Darkfield blocks direct reflection to emphasize scattered light.
\n
Polarized light (typical for polarizing microscopes) reveals anisotropy and birefringence in oriented materials.
\n
Fluorescence excitation (add-on to compound/inverted) isolates emissions from specific fluorophores using excitation and emission filters and dichroic mirrors, enabling high-contrast labeling of structures. This is a modality layered on geometry, not a separate type by itself.
\n
\n
Each contrast method places demands on optics and illumination. For example, phase contrast requires a matched set of objectives and condenser annuli, and DIC requires polarizers and prisms specified for particular objectives and wavelengths. These are modular capabilities most readily found on compound and inverted platforms.
\n
Camera sampling and “empty magnification”
\n
When imaging to a camera, sensor pixel size and magnification determine sampling. To record all the detail an objective resolves, the image of the specimen at the sensor should be sampled at least twice per smallest resolvable feature in each spatial dimension (Nyquist sampling). If you use large pixels and low magnification, you may undersample; if you use extremely high on-screen magnification without increasing NA, you simply produce “empty magnification.”
\n
Practical guidance:
\n
\n
Match camera adapters (e.g., 0.5×, 1×) to the sensor size and field you wish to capture, considering the total optical magnification.
\n
Ensure stable, even illumination appropriate to the contrast method. A camera can exaggerate flicker and hotspots; diffused ring lights or properly adjusted transmitted illumination reduce artifacts.
\n
Use vibration-damped stands for high magnification, especially with compound and metallurgical systems at high NA.
\n
\n
Putting it all together
\n
Suppose you need to inspect both a PCB and the microstructure of a polished metal coupon. A stereo microscope with a ring light is perfect for the PCB: long working distance, 3D perception, and low-NA tolerance for uneven components. For the metal coupon, you would switch to a reflected-light microscope with high-NA objectives and options for brightfield or darkfield reflected illumination to reveal grain boundaries and scratches. If you also need to analyze birefringence in a polymer film, a polarizing microscope adds the necessary polarizers and rotating stage.
\n
These examples show how microscope “type” drives workable illumination, contrast, and resolving power—a theme echoed throughout this guide. When in doubt, start with your specimen’s transparency, required detail level, and handling constraints, then map them to the types explained earlier in this article.
\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions
\n
Is a stereo microscope or a compound microscope better for beginners?
\n
It depends on what the beginner wants to see. If the goal is to explore everyday objects—coins, stamps, insects, plants, small mechanical parts—and to handle them under the optics, a stereo microscope is friendlier: it has a large working distance, generous depth of field, and intuitive 3D viewing. If the goal is to study prepared slides and thin, transparent specimens (e.g., pond water organisms, plant cells) with higher detail, a compound microscope is the right tool. The two types complement each other rather than one being universally “better.”
\n
Do digital microscopes have higher resolution than optical microscopes?
\n
A digital microscope’s resolution is governed by the optical system, not just the camera sensor. The limiting factor for detail is the objective’s NA and the illumination wavelength, as summarized by d ≈ 0.61 · λ / NA. A high-resolution camera can faithfully capture the detail provided by the optics but cannot create fine structure that the lens does not resolve. Choose sensor sampling and adapters that match the optical resolution to avoid undersampling or empty magnification. For many inspection tasks, the ergonomic and collaborative benefits of digital microscopes are compelling even when ultimate resolution is not required.
\n\n
Final Thoughts on Choosing the Right Microscope Type
\n
\n \ntypical optical stereo microscope for academic use in 1980-1990s,Nikon SMZ-10 Artist: GcG(jawp)\n
\n
\n
Understanding microscope types empowers you to match tool to task. Stereo microscopes deliver comfortable, 3D, low-magnification views of real-world objects. Compound and inverted microscopes provide high-resolution detail for thin, transparent specimens and dish-based samples. Metallurgical microscopes excel at opaque surfaces under reflected light, while polarizing microscopes reveal orientation-dependent properties that ordinary illumination masks. Digital systems bring ergonomic, shareable viewing and measurement to any of these optical foundations.
If you found this guide useful, explore our other articles on optical principles and practical microscopy techniques, and subscribe to our newsletter to receive future deep dives straight to your inbox.
No related posts.
Stay In Touch
Be the first to know about new articles and receive our FREE e-book
![\"Dark](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Dark_Cool_Optical_Microscope.png/1280px-Dark_Cool_Optical_Microscope.png?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail\")
\n![\"Olympus](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Olympus_SZIII_stereo_microscope.jpg?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail_unscaled\")
\n![\"Binocular](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Binocular_compound_microscope%2C_Carl_Zeiss_Jena%2C_1914_%286779276516%29.jpg/1280px-Binocular_compound_microscope%2C_Carl_Zeiss_Jena%2C_1914_%286779276516%29.jpg?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail\")
\n![\"Inverted](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/Inverted_Microscope.jpg/1280px-Inverted_Microscope.jpg?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail\")
\n![\"Dissecting](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Dissecting_Microscope_and_Light_Source.png/1280px-Dissecting_Microscope_and_Light_Source.png?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail\")
\n![\"Optical](\"https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Optical_stereo_microscope_nikon_smz10.jpg/1280px-Optical_stereo_microscope_nikon_smz10.jpg?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail\")
\n